Top Three Myths about Immigration
Prof. Ben Powell explores the top three myths about immigration. After analyzing the data, he finds that immigrants in fact do not have negative effects on the economy, jobs, or wages.
Top 3 Myths About Immigration
The next myth is that they steal our jobs. There’s absolutely no evidence for this.
I’m Ben Powell, Professor of Economics at Suffolk University. I want to explode three popular myths about immigration.
Immigration’s a contentious issue, but unfortunately a lot of the public debate is centered on the wrong things. These three myths are that immigrants are a net drag on our economy, they steal our jobs, and they depress our wages. None of these are true. Immigrants are a net benefit to the economy. Economists who study immigration, even economists who are otherwise critical of immigration, are in almost universal agreement on this. They don’t think the net economic benefit is huge, but all agree that it’s positive.
The next myth is that they steal our jobs. There’s absolutely no evidence for this. This is a fallacy of the seen and the unseen. When an immigrant comes in, it’s obvious when we see an American worker who loses his job. But what we don’t see is that another job is created for that American. That’s why, over time, we don’t find a net increase in unemployment as immigrants come in. Think about what’s happened to the workforce in the last 60 years: massive entry of baby boomers, women, and immigrants into the workforce, but yet no increase in long-term unemployment. You still have business cycles and fluctuations in unemployment, but no long-term increase. Instead, we see as the labor force increases, so does total employment.
That brings us to wages. So we add more workers to the workforce. Mustn’t that depress U.S. wages? Again we don’t find much evidence for this. In fact, the only wage depression that economists find is when you look at just people without a high school diploma in the United States, and even there the negative effect on their wages is very small. And the reason is, immigrant labor is different than the domestic labor. They bring a different skill set. So often, immigrants who come are very highly skilled or very low skilled. A lot of U.S. labor is somewhere in the middle, moderately skilled, but very few of us are at the top of the pyramid, and very few of us are at the bottom. The result is, when immigrants come, they largely complement our talents. They don’t substitute for us. It frees American labor to do things that American labor is better suited to do. As a result, we become more productive, and they become more productive.
Whatever your position was on immigration before, if one of these three myths was holding you back, it should push you more on the margin to wanting more open borders, not less.
Right-click the link below and select "Save Link" or "Save Target."








Comments
Thanks for your refreshing contrarian* viewpoint that's corroborated by Beaulier, Luke, and Smith in their Jan/Feb 2012 article in Freeman Magazine, entitled "Tough on Immigration is Tough on Economic Growth".
*By 'contrarian' I mean against the prevailing 'conservative' myths rather than against the general findings of the economic academy (with which I'm not familiar).
This is well-done, as was your video on Public Choice Theory (Why Politicians Don't Cut Spending). Delightfully effective graphics and music, too.
It falls to this generation to correct long-held misperceptions in ethics, history, and economics. LearnLiberty.org is one of the most effective vehicles I've seen to date, to accomplish that goal.
Keep up the excellent work.
D.M. Zuniga, P.E.
Founder, AmericaAgain! Trust
http://thisbloodlesslibertythebook.blogspot.com/2011/09/exposing-fools-g...
Professor Powell,
Thank you for the follow-up lecture on the subject at: http://www.learnliberty.org/videos/economics-immigration-myths-and-reali...
George M.
Hiawatha, KS
Professor Powell... Please accept my sincere apologies as I am not intending to poo-poo your position, rather to possibly expand upon it to it's needed form. I am not an educated economist, nor have I received any higher level education, but I think you might agree with my opinion.
I believe your position on this subject would be 100% true if the US was NOT a welfare state. Milton Friedman talked in detail about these very issues on immigration, open borders, and the US welfare policy. I tend to agree with him that if the US did not have a state welfare program, we could go back to a 100% open border policy.
The problem with allowing open immigration while the US has a welfare program lies with those who immigrate are not forced to become productive from the start, or they can expend less effort at becoming productive because they know they have a safety net to fall back on. Typically this safety net created by the US welfare system creates conditions that are better than what they were leaving, therefore the decrease in poverty AND the increase in living conditions can directly impact an immigrant's incentive to become productive thereby causing a negative effect on the overall economy.
Your returned reply would be welcome and encouraged because like I said above, I am not highly educated.
George M.
Hiawatha, KS